Influence of the technique and comorbidities in hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: To analyze the differences in toxicity and biochemical relapse-free survival with hypofractionated radiotherapy with three-dimensional radiotherapy (3D-CRT) or volumetric arc therapy (VMAT) for prostate cancer taking into account comorbidity measured using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). METHODS: From January 2011 to June 2016, 451 patients with prostate cancer were treated with 60 Gy (20 daily fractions). VMAT or 3D-CRT was used. Distribution by stage: 17% low-risk, 27.2% intermediate-risk; 39.2% high-risk, 16.6% very high-risk. Mean CCI was 3.4. RESULTS: With a median follow up of 51 months, most patients did not experience any degree of acute GI toxicity (80.9%) compared to 19.1%, who experienced some degree, mainly G-I /II. In the multivariate analysis, only technique was associated with acute GI toxicity ≥ G2. Patients treated with VMAT had greater acute GI toxicity compared with those who received 3D-CRT (23.9% vs. 13.5%, p = 0.005). With respect to acute GU toxicity, 72.7% of patients experienced some degree, fundamentally G-I/II. Neither age, CCI, nor androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were associated with greater toxicity. Overall survival at 2, 5 and 7 years was 97%, 88% and 83% respectively. The only factor with statistical significance was CCI, with a greater number of events in individuals with a CCI ≥ 4 (p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Hypofractionated radiotherapy for prostate cancer is an effective, well-tolerated treatment even for elderly patients with no associated comorbidity. Longer follow up is needed in order to report data on late toxicity.

Radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities

Sarcomas are an infrequent and heterogeneous group of neoplasia. Surgery with or without associated radiotherapy (RT) is the basic treatment for this type of tumour. To increase the therapeutic ratio (the index between cytotoxic effects in tumours and normal tissue complications with a certain dose of radiation), new advances are being investigated to increase local and distant control and to decrease the morbidity of the treatment. The aim of this review was to analyse the different strategies, based on technology and biology, which are being investigated to increase the therapeutic ratio of this disease

No disponible

Radiotherapy in soft-tissue sarcoma of the extremities.

Sarcomas are an infrequent and heterogeneous group of neoplasia. Surgery with or without associated radiotherapy (RT) is the basic treatment for this type of tumour. To increase the therapeutic ratio (the index between cytotoxic effects in tumours and normal tissue complications with a certain dose of radiation), new advances are being investigated to increase local and distant control and to decrease the morbidity of the treatment. The aim of this review was to analyse the different strategies, based on technology and biology, which are being investigated to increase the therapeutic ratio of this disease.

Competing causes of death in patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant boost radiation plus concurrent weekly cisplatin

BACKGROUND: This study analyzes the morbidity and the contribution of different causes of death to the outcome of patients with locally advanced head and- neck cancer after weekly cisplatin plus concomitant boost accelerated radiation treated in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety-four patients with locally advanced head and neck carcinoma were included in this phase II trial consisting of concomitant boost radiation plus concurrent weekly cisplatin. The 43 patients treated in our centered with long-term follow-up were analyzed. Patients received radiotherapy with a concomitant boost scheme (1.8 Gy on days 1-40 and 1.5 Gy boost on days 25-40 with a total dose of 72 Gy) and concurrent cisplatin, 40 mg/m(2) weekly, for the first 4 weeks. RESULTS: Most patients (93 %) received both radiation and complete chemotherapy according to protocol. Severe late toxicity presented were subcutaneous (5 %), larynx (2 %) and esophagous (5 %). Grade I-II late toxicity included mainly xerostomy (30 %), skin (16 %) and mucosal (16 %) toxicity. With a median follow-up of 95 months (9-135), the median overall survival and progression-free survival were 26 and 19 months, respectively (95 % CI 1-52; and 95 % CI 0-45); 60 % of the patients died because of head and neck cancer and 12 % of a second neoplasm, while 27 % of non-cancer patients died. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer treated with concomitant boost accelerated radiation plus chemotherapy show significant risks of mortality from causes other than disease progression (AU)